ballistic missile Iran Active assessment
IRGC-AF missile bases (dispersed) Iran

Emad Ballistic Missile

designation Emad-1
class Medium-Range Ballistic Missile (MRBM)
range ~1,700 km
stages 1 (liquid-fuel)
propellant Liquid (UDMH/NTO, assessed)
warhead ~750 kg conventional HE
guidance Inertial + terminal maneuverable reentry vehicle (MaRV)
cep ~500 m (Iranian claim); Western estimates vary, assessed 300-500 m
length ~15.8 m
diameter ~1.25 m
launch platform Road-mobile TEL

The Emad (meaning “Pillar”) is Iran’s first ballistic missile equipped with a maneuverable reentry vehicle (MaRV), representing a significant shift from area-effect bombardment toward precision strike capability. It is a derivative of the Shahab-3/Ghadr family, sharing the same liquid-fueled airframe but incorporating a redesigned nosecone with aerodynamic control surfaces for terminal-phase maneuvering.

Development timeline. Iran first tested the Emad in October 2015, with Supreme Leader Khamenei and Defense Minister Dehghan both publicly acknowledging the program. The test drew immediate condemnation from Western governments, who argued it violated the spirit of UNSC Resolution 2231 (the JCPOA-related resolution restricting Iranian ballistic missile activity “designed to be capable of delivering nuclear weapons”). Iran rejected this characterization, maintaining the missile was purely conventional. Serial production was announced in 2016-2017.

Precision vs. area effect. The Emad’s MaRV is the distinguishing feature. Older Shahab-3 variants follow a purely ballistic trajectory after boost phase, resulting in circular error probable (CEP) measured in kilometers — useful only for striking large area targets (cities, industrial complexes, airfields). The Emad’s terminal maneuvering capability reduces CEP to an assessed 300-500 meters, enabling it to target specific military installations, port facilities, or command centers. Iranian sources claim even tighter accuracy; Western assessments are more conservative.

Operational significance. The MaRV also complicates missile defense. A maneuvering warhead is harder to intercept than one following a predictable ballistic arc, as the defense system must update its tracking solution continuously during the terminal phase. This makes the Emad a higher-threat system than legacy Shahab-3 variants even at the same range.

Combat employment. The Emad is assessed to have been among the missile types employed during Iranian strikes on regional targets. Its liquid-fuel propulsion requires a fueling process before launch (typically 30-60 minutes), which makes it more vulnerable to preemptive strike than solid-fuel alternatives like the Sejjil. This is a known doctrinal trade-off: the IRGC mitigates it through dispersal, hardened shelters, and the sheer depth of its missile inventory.

Strategic context. The Emad represents a transitional system — more capable than the Shahab-3 but still constrained by liquid-fuel logistics. Iran’s trajectory points toward solid-fuel precision systems (Kheibar Shekan, Fattah) as the future of its strike force, with the Emad serving as the proof-of-concept that validated MaRV integration into the Iranian arsenal.

Sources